Community suitability of Totigi, Japan
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 79
91
best land · p90
99%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 76
Governance, safety & tenure 83
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 76
Climate, growing & hazards 94
Autonomy & access 76
Where it pushes back
Water availability & qualityLand cover & degradationLegal entity & land framework
Within Totigi — 49 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Asiomati
strongest Autonomy & access (98) ·
weakest Land & water (62)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Awanomati
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (98) ·
weakest Land & water (73)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Kurobanemati
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (98) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (76)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Kuzuumati
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (99) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (72)
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 82
Nasumati
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (76)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Batoomati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 81
Huziharamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Kuriyamamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Kuroisosi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Karasuyamamati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 80
Motegimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 80
Nikkoosi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Kanumasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Siobaramati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Sioyamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Tanumamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 79
Yudukamimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 79
Ootawarasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Yaitasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Imaitisi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Nisinasunomati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 77
Ogawamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Masikomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Itikaimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Minaminasumati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Nisikatamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Totigisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Iwahunemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Kituregawamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Ninomiyamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Oohiramati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Tugamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Mookasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Huziokamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Kamikawatimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Kokubunzimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Minamikawatimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Sanosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Uziiemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Hagamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Takanezawamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Asikagasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Kaminokawamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Kawatimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Mibumati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Isibasimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Oyamasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Utunomiyasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
Nogimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Japan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.