Community suitability of Toyama, Japan
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 78
80
best land · p90
89%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 76
Governance, safety & tenure 83
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 61
Climate, growing & hazards 90
Autonomy & access 87
Where it pushes back
Water availability & qualityLand cover & degradationSoil quality
Within Toyama — 34 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Asahimati
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (65)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Kamiitimati
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (65)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 81
Uodusi
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (64)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 81
Kamitairamura
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (56)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Tateyamamati
strongest Autonomy & access (99) ·
weakest Land & water (62)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Togamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Tairamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Unadukimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Kurobesi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Ooyamamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Hukumitumati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Nyuuzenmati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Zyoohanamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Hosoirimura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Inokutimura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Yatuomati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Inamimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 71
Yamadamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 71
Syoogawamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 70
Himisi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 69
Hukunomati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 68
Namerikawasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 68
Oosawanomati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 67
Oyabesi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 67
Hukuokamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 65
Tonamisi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 65
Hutyuumati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Daimonmati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Kosugimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Takaokasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Simomura
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 49
Toyamasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 49
Oosimamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 38
Sinminatosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Japan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.