Community suitability of Wakayama, Japan
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 79
83
best land · p90
69%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 76
Governance, safety & tenure 83
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 56
Climate, growing & hazards 96
Autonomy & access 89
Where it pushes back
Water availability & qualityLand cover & degradationSoil quality
Within Wakayama — 50 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Hikigawatyoo
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (47)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Kamitondatyoo
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (55)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Nakahetityoo
strongest Autonomy & access (99) ·
weakest Land & water (46)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Nakatumura
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (64)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Sirahamatyoo
strongest Autonomy & access (98) ·
weakest Land & water (55)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Tanabesi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Hanazonomura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Inamityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Kawabetyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Minabegawamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Minabetyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Ootoomura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Susamityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Kooyatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Mihamatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Miyamamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Ryuuzinmura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Simizutyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Hidakatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Kudoyamatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Goboosi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 74
Hirokawatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 74
Misatotyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 74
Kanayatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Katuragityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Kooyagutityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Yuratyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Hasimotosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Kusimototyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 71
Nokamityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Kokawatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Momoyamatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Yuasatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Nagatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Kibityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Aridasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Utitatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Kisigawatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Simotutyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Kainansi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Iwadetyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Wakayamasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 52
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Japan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.